AAUW advances equity for women and girls through advocacy, education, philanthropy and research. Founded in 1881, AAUW is open to graduates with an associate or higher degree from an accredited college or university, as well as students currently enrolled in college. Dues support the operations of the Dearborn-Michigan branch, founded in 1933, as well as the state and national organizations.
Taking risks is complex. The risks of sharing sexually transmitted diseases has been thoroughly documented. Now studies have investigated how sexually adventurous women are affected socially, emotionally and mentally.
Women who engaged in risky sexual behavior while traveling told a researcher that they felt freed from a sexual double standard at home, and hoped to “feel like a man by having a one-night stand — no emotional strings attached.” For others, “sexual activity has to be related to feelings and some degree of attachment,” says Liza Berdychevsky, assistant professor at the University of Illinois. She has interviewed women to gain understanding of their perceptions and motivations for sexual experimentation. Some tourist destinations and experiences promote “an altered sense of reality … while minimizing perceptions of risk and long-term consequences. Sometimes that introspection leads to beneficial experiences. Some learn a lesson, how to reject, how to be more empowered, how to be more vocal or how to insist on contraception.”
Although the immortality and invincibility that young people experience often leads to ignoring consequences, senior citizens have adopted simular experimental behaviors, especially within retirement communities. During the last decade, AIDS cases among senior citizens have soared. Due to Viagra and similar drugs, older Americans are increasingly sexually active. Sadly, many older women who’ve passed menopause don’t use protection because they know they can’t get pregnant. They do get STDs in large numbers though.
The number of families living on less than $2 per person/per day has doubled since 1996. Sadly, it has tripled for families headed by a lone woman! (source: National Poverty Center)
Women are more likely than men to have a minimum-wage job, and women are more likely to be raising a family alone.
After measuring factors such as education, health and material well-being, UNICEF found the United States ranked 23 out of 24 nations in the deleterious effects poverty has upon the nation’s neediest children when compared to children in median income homes.
This excerpt is lifted directly from a review that appeared in The New York Times:
The breast milk of the writer Florence Williams contains a striking level of perchlorate, a key component of rocket fuel. Her mammary glands are no different from those of most American women. Breast-feeding still passes many good things from mother to baby: vitamins, minerals and “a solid hedge of extras to help ward off a lifetime of diseases.” But the practice also typically transfers “paint thinners, dry-cleaning fluids, wood preservatives, toilet deodorizers, cosmetic additives, gasoline by-products, rocket fuel, termite poisons, fungicides” and varieties of flame retardants, one of which, Penta-BDE, was banned by the European Union because of its chronic toxicity to humans.
Consider reading: BREASTS: A Natural and Unnatural History by Florence Williams,
W. W. Norton & Company. $25.95.
However, that is certainly NOT the case for our elected representatives and senators in D.C. They average one-hundred days less, or twenty-fewer weeks at work! They show up for work a mere 55% of the days that American workers do. Does this help explain why this 113th Congress gets so little accomplished?
- In 2014, the House is scheduled to be in session for 133 days.
- In 2012, the House was in session for 153 days.
- In 2010 the House was in session 128 days.
- In 2008, the House was in session 119 days.
- In 2006, the House was in session 104 days.
Before becoming a judge, she was a prominent women’s rights litigator, overcoming obstacles related to her gender. Before that, she had attended Harvard Law School as one of nine women in a class of more than 500! She graduated from Columbia Law School, then was turned down by law firms and was refused judicial clerk-ships because she was a woman. When she became a professor at Rutgers School of Law, she was told she would be paid less than her male colleagues because her lawyer husband had a good job! Later she became the first-tenured-female professor at Columbia Law School. Today, she is a justice of the United States Supreme Court.
She still works with men, five of whom still do not understand the challenges women face while trying to achieve equity and equality. Last week at a speaking engagement, she said the court has never fully embraced “the ability of women to decide for themselves what their destiny will be.”
Legal scholars argue that the court has recently discouraged women with rulings in cases involving equal pay, medical leaves, abortion and contraception. In July, 2014, the court’s three-female members delivered a spirited dissent.
Regarding the role of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the court’s swing vote, Ginsburg has not minced words. She once dissented that his rulings regarding sexual freedom and motherhood reflect “ancient notions about women’s place in the family.” The South Carolina Law Review claims that “Justice Kennedy relies on traditional and paternalistic gender stereotypes about nontraditional fathers, idealized mothers and second-guessing women’s decisions.”
In women’s-rights cases, Justice Ginsburg has issued a series of honed dissents. She believes the Supreme Court made a grave error in its Hobby Lobby decision, which allowed some employers to refuse to pay for insurance coverage for contraception based upon religious objections. “There was no way to read that decision narrowly.” She feels it opens the door to job discrimination against women. Her analogy is instructive: “What of the employer whose religious faith teaches that it’s sinful to employ a single woman without her father’s consent or a married woman without her husband’s consent?”
Summarizing dissent from the bench is rare and signals fervent disagreement. Typically, Ginsburg’s oral dissents have concerned women’s rights.
In 2007, the only female justice at that time, Justice Ginsburg issued her dissent from the bench in an abortion case and labeled Justice Kennedy’s worldview alarming. A month later, she issued a second oral dissent in another 5-to-4 decision, Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., this one protesting what she called the majority’s cramped interpretation of time limits for filing sex discrimination suits. Later, Congress overturned the ruling.
In 2012, she again dissented in Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, a 5-to-4 decision limiting the availability of medical leaves. Justice Kennedy saw no “widespread evidence of sex discrimination or sex stereotyping in the administration of sick leave,” while Justice Ginsburg said from the bench that the decision made it harder for women “to live balanced lives, at home and in gainful employment.”
“At the same time,” she added, “we live in a society that now seems more receptive to gay rights than women’s rights generally, so it is disheartening but not surprising to see that reflected in decisions like Hobby Lobby, which failed to see the link between contraception access and women’s equality.”
She asserts male colleagues sometimes do not hear a woman’s voice, including her own.
Between 2006 and 2009, after the resignation of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and before the appointment of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Ginsburg was the lone woman on the court, a situation she said she found isolating and disturbing. Now, with the addition of Justice Elena Kagan in 2010, there are three women. They often vote together.
Last month the three dissented from an order that allowed Wheaton College, a Christian institution in Illinois, to forego using a federal form to claim an exemption from a contraception coverage requirement under the Affordable Care Act. Justice Sotomayor wrote the dissent, which accused the majority of failing to protect “women’s well-being.” A law professor at Georgetown University, Nan Hunter, labeled the dissent noteworthy. “For many American women it was no surprise that it was those three justices who felt strongly enough to cry foul.”
Information for this entry is sourced from “As Gays Prevail in Supreme Court, Women See Setbacks” by Adam Liptak in the New York Times.
Rebels in Ukraine
Taliban taking Afghanistan
Sunni versus Shiite in Iraq
Islamist militants in Mali
Famine in Somalia
Militias in Libya
Ebola in Guinea
Nukes in Iran
Drug lords in Central America
Typhoons in Korea
Airplanes falling out of the sky
Fires, Floods, Earthquakes, Mudslides, Lightning Strikes
“Making suffering loom larger, by globalizing it, may spur people to feel they ought to care more. It also invites them to feel that the sufferings and misfortunes are too vast, too irrevocable, too epic to be much changed by an local, political intervention.” — Susan Sontag
That sums up why organizations like AAUW work so effectively. They provide people who continue to care with one attainable mission that makes common sense. We know, that over time and with concerted effort we can achieve our goal to “advance equity for women and girls through advocacy, education, philanthropy and research.”
The Battle Creek branch of AAUW is planning to screen
Girl Rising, a docu-drama from Academy Award-nominated director Richard E. Robbins.
Millions of girls in the world today face barriers to education that boys do not. This film focuses upon nine-ordinary girls, all of whom live in the developing world, as they confront challenges and overcome odds to pursue the dream of being educated. Witness the strength of their human spirit and the power of education to make societal change. You’ll be glad you did!
WHEN: Tuesday August 12, 2014
WHERE: 2500 West Columbia Avenue, Battle Creek, MI
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
RSVP in advance by “purchasing” tickets. (Your credit card will not be charged until there are enough reservations to assure screening the film. Once enough tickets have been reserved, you will receive an e-mail from Gathr Films prompting you to print your tickets. Then, and only then, your credit card will be charged.)
Please visit: <https://gathr.us/screening/reserve/8455> to reserve your ticket.
Watch the trailer at <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJsvklXhYaE> You’ll want to see the film.
Contact Jenny Andrews, AAUW-Battle Creek Branch President at (269) 967-1374 or via email <firstname.lastname@example.org> if you have questions or concerns.
More than 1,300 women from 85 countries recently met recently in France for the 24th Global Summit of Women — “Women: Redesigning Economies, Societies”.
While recognizing that three major forces shape culture — business, politics and religion — speakers coalesced around key understandings:
- Research proves that Gender Equity creates significant economic and social benefits.
- Efforts to re-tool women to think and act like men are misdirected.
- Girls must be encouraged then educated to withstand negative cultural messages.
- Gender Violence (whether genital cutting, using rape as a tool to subjugate victims in war zones, sexual trafficking, domestic violence, religious rationalizations) must cease! Sexual violence is a global plague that can be eradicated.
- Change happens only when collective power activates. Making societal change is enormously difficult. It needs a shift of collective consciousness to occur.
So, how can businesses, political movements and religious groups be changed in an effort to reshape cultures?
- Individuals must understand that these societal shifts are for the betterment of their daughters, their sons, their grandchildren.
- Men must engage in the struggle. They must do so for their mothers, their aunts, their wives, their sisters, their children. As men step us as allies, they will model for others how to ameliorate gender inequity. They will reach out to engage their fathers, uncles husbands, brothers, male bosses and colleagues. Otherwise women activists will remain confined in restrictive echo chambers of discourse. Men must be persuaded to help make change, for peer pressure is a potent force.
- Companies not committed to gender parity must be perceived as obsolete. NAMING and SHAMING companies mired in the good-old-boys, locker-room level of leadership can help too. If masses of stockholders began to dis-invest, change could be swift. Check out “Pax World Funds” as a place to begin.
In her book, POWERING UP! How America’s Women Achievers Become Leaders, Anne Doyle wrote a chapter called, “What Do Men Have To Do With It?” Her answer is: “they have EVERYTHING to do with girls and women becoming equal global citizens. From stopping sexual violence — against girls, women, boys and other men — to tackling gender inequity and prying open leadership locker room doors, men’s active engagement is essential. Why? For two major reasons: 1) Men still hold over 80% of the decision-making positions all over the world and 2) Men will follow other men and respond to peer pressure from other males. Look for those men. They are all around you. Start a conversation.”
She has exciting news to share. She has penned a new one-act play set in Detroit entitled “Between the Thorns.”
The production features Carissa Madley and Madelyn Porter. Collette declares the two of them to be the most gifted actors with whom she has ever worked. Madelyn Porter is a performing artist at The Henry Ford. In addition, she works as an actress, comedienne and storyteller. Carissa Madley graduated from Eastern Michigan University with a degree in vocal-music education, teaches school and participates in community theatre.
Collette explains that “Between the Thorns” is about real people, what she calls the brick-and-mortar folks of Detroit. Her play celebrates their unique voices and diversity. She hopes her characters’ stories will spur audiences to dream of a better world. Collette plans to develop her new play into a longer work.
This is Collette’s second year participating in Random Acts of Theatre. Last year, she produced “Annie Speaks” about Helen Keller’s teacher, Annie Sullivan. Ordinarily, Collette presents the play as a dramatic monologue, but last year at Random Acts she divided the play into two parts. One actress played the young Annie; the other portrayed her as a senior citizen. It was a highly successful gambit and made a lasting impression. A few props, detailed costuming, and a grand Irish lilt succeeded in bringing Annie Sullivan back to life.
Last year, opening night sold out. So buy your tickets soon to avoid disappointment. Hope to see many AAUW members in the audience August 15 and 16, 2014. Tickets are $15 for general admission and $12 for seniors and students.
Dear World Book Night U.S. friend,
After three years in which thousands and thousands of you distributed over a million and half specially-printed World Book Night paperbacks across America, we are sad to announce that we are suspending operations. The expenses of running World Book Night U.S., even given the significant financial and time commitment from publishers, writers, booksellers, librarians, printers, distributors, shippers–and you, our amazing givers!–are too high to sustain.
This has been a remarkable, passionate undertaking, and it has been a success by all measures, except for one: Outside funding. For three years, the publishing industry and book community have very generously footed the bill and contributed enormous time and effort, and we are so very grateful for all the support.
We did receive some funds via individual donations, and we worked very hard to get grants. We did get some, but there are a lot of other worthy causes out there and only so much money available. We can’t carry on without significant, sustainable outside funding.
From World Book Night U.S. Board Chairman Michael Pietsch: “World Book Night’s first three years have been a profound experience for everyone involved. The altruistic spirit of the givers and of industry supporters have reminded us all of the transformative impact books have on people’s lives, and of the power of a book as a gift. The World Book Night Board joins me in extending their deep gratitude to all who have taken part.”
WBN U.S. Exec Director Carl Lennertz added: “Some of you know our names here, but I want to be sure you know these–Laura Peraza and Carolyn Schwartz. They have been here since day one, and they, along with you, are my heroes. Alia Almeida joined us this year and was a creative force. A list of all the booksellers, librarians, authors, and folks in publishing and at Ingram would be too long to include here, but they know who they are and I know they have loved being a part of this beautiful thing we did together.”
We are staying on hand through the summer without pay to maintain social media contact with you all, to talk good books, and to announce the winner of the giver essay contest.
YOU, the givers, made it possible for WBN to reach its full potential. For us here at World Book Night, this experience has been life-changing, as we hope it has been for you and recipients of the books. Our gratitude to you is simply immeasurable.
With much love, appreciation, and admiration, thank you!
Team WBN U.S